Essays --

It is no secret that in the decennary after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, defense expending increased in the United States, but something that people are little aware of are the continued g overnment efforts toward biological defense protecting a country of more than 317 million people from the threat of biological warfare. In 2004, Congress passed the Project Bioshield Act. The aim of Project Bioshield was to create a grocery for medical products to be provided to the public at large in the eccentric of bioterrorism. It called for more than 5 billion dollars to be utilise to purchase vaccines, over a 10-year period. (The White House, 2004). As we approach the 10-year mark of Project Bioshield, and analyze all of the advancements in bioengineering and bio engineering science that conduct occurred since then, its measurable to reflect but also to look forward into what the next decade of biodefense innovation might look like, and what ethical impacts it may have. fit in to a paper published by the Center for Bioethics at the capital of South Carolina University College of Physicians and Surgeons (Loike and Fischbach, 2013), we face eight ethical challenges as our biodefense efforts increase. 1. allotment of resources and military group and cost benefit analysis. 2. Triage assessment.3. Clinical testing of potential therapies or vaccines in young children and older adults.4. Preventing unauthorized individuals from entering research laboratories.5. Dual-use publication of cover containing useful information that also could be used to create bioweapons.6. Dual-use curtailing the knowledge of harmful technologies while promoting beneficial applications by scientists of these technologies.7. Restriction of personal freedoms.8. Allocation of ... ...lications of biodefense technology, of which biological engineers are at the heart of. Biological engineers have a triple role in biodefense some nonplus biodefense technolog y some find applications for advanced biodefense technology all have an obligation to offset printing and foremost protect the people. The first fundamental canon of the Code of Ethics for Engineers is that Engineers, in the fulfillment of their maestro duties, shall hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public (NSPE). Developing new biodefense technology fits in with this mission, but only if we also take business concern of the three ethical issues raised above adequately testing new vaccines and medical products so that they do not pose risk to the user, cover care in publishing new technology that could be used in a harmful way, and promoting beneficial applications of such technology.